Thursday, March 24, 2016

Longtime Reading city solicitor is named temporary city managing director

by Steve Reinbrecht

Reading Mayor Wally Scott has named Charles Younger, the city's top lawyer, to temporarily be the city's top administrator, I hear.


Younger is to be the interim managing director, effective immediately.

Thomas Coleman is new acting solicitor.

Josephina Encarnacion was named administrative services director.

Former Mayor Joe Eppihimer hired Younger in January 2000, right after starting his first term. 





City Council fired Younger in May 2000. The next day, Eppihimer hired Younger back as a legal adviser. Keith Mooney was appointed solicitor in May 2003 after a lawsuit over the whole mess. Mooney resigned in February 2004. Council named Younger as permanent solicitor in January 2005.

Sunday, March 20, 2016

Reading Eagle headlines give peaceful picture

By Steve Reinbrecht

These are the headlines in the Berks and Beyond section of the Reading Eagle on Sunday. The B section is one of Berks County's sparse sources of local news. With a struggling urban school district, stagnant economic growth, thriving immigrant communities from all over the world, clogged roads, the FBI probing City Hall ... there's lots to cover.

But these stories seem like the offerings of a suburban weekly ad-rag, like the Merchandiser, not a daily newspaper with a large staff of young reporters covering a county of 413,000, including a poverty-stricken city of 90,000.

B1
-- Frigid plunge nets $50,000 for children
-- Next to the ice cream, frozen memories
B2
-- A farm-spun Easter
-- Wanted in Berks
B3
-- Easter Bunny makes new friends 
B4
--Jazz, auction help library raise $70,000
-- Search for two brothers still on after school incident [although, if you read the story, there was no school incident]
B5
--Bollywood comes to Berks for gala
B6 TRI-COUNTY [Pottstown news]
-- Pottstown railroad platform on schedule
-- Free dental care offered to children
-- Mural in Boyertown to be touched up
B7 [more Pottstown]
-- Gala raises $15,000 for senior center
B8 [still more Pottstown]
--Pottstown High senior wins contest with chicken sandwich
B9-B11
-- Obituaries
B14
-- Eggs, eggs everywhere


The message from the newsroom: There is no news in Berks County, and any problems are being solved by well-wishers organizing charity projects.

Reading Eagle: Baby murdered? Meh

by Steve Reinbrecht

Somebody killed a baby in Reading in December, but we don’t know much about it.

Anthony Dinozzo Snyder, 3 months old, died Dec. 7 of poisoning and starvation. The death was ruled a homicide.

The first mention of the crime that I could find in the Reading Eagle is a 135-word story March 10, three months after the death, when the district attorney released a statement calling the death a homicide.

How did our award-winning newsgathering organization miss the suspicious death of an infant? Doesn’t an Eagle reporter call the Reading police every morning and ask if they had anything interesting? Doesn’t someone look at the radio calls for things like unresponsive babies? Wouldn’t a source mention something like this?

Compare that to coverage of a similar story by the Herald Standard newspaper in Uniontown. Lydia Wright, 23 months old, died in that city of malnutrition and dehydration Feb. 24. Three days later, the Lafayette County coroner said he would not release the preliminary autopsy reports. But at least he made the crime public.



In Uniontown, a reporter discovered that police, a deputy coroner and a children and youth services worker searched “the 26 Collins Ave. home.”

Did anybody search the Reading house where the infant was starved and poisoned? That’s public information. If so what does the search warrant say? If not, why not?

Reporters in Uniontown found out that children and youth services had removed two other children from the toddler’s home.

The Reading Eagle is satisfied with a written statement three months after a baby is murdered.

What is the world coming to?

Why haven’t our local media pressed this, and why haven’t crimefighters provided more details?

Because the local media never press the crimefighters. From municipal officers to the district attorney, their words are never checked or challenged. Officials have nothing to lose by stonewalling. And the Reading Eagle opens wide to be spoon-fed information on the officials' terms.

It’s not just me with questions. Along with many other media, Pennlive, in Philadelphia, had a story.

“I understand the investigation is ongoing, but not to say anything? I wonder if they had suspicions all along, or if police were totally blindsided by this finding?” T911 asked in a comment on that story.

“What address? Parents? Family? Information?” asked commenter Wouldya.

"Great questions. And they were all being asked. Right now, as the story says, the police and the DA are mum on any other details. The poor baby died back in December. And it's taken this long to get a ruling of homicide," Pennlive reporter John Luciew commented.

The Eagle bows to authority. If the police or district attorney won’t tell us more, so be it, newsroom leaders say. Or they think this story is too sordid to cover. 

Which is exactly the opposite of why media are protected in the Constitution – to get to the bottom of the cases when police or prosecutors won’t give information.

And to make sure the authorities know someone will always be asking questions, and making it public when the authorities refuse to answer.

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Tom Caltagirone challenges 238 of Mallory Scott's signatures

by Steve Reinbrecht

State Rep. Tom Caltagirone has represented most of Reading in Harrisburg since Nixon was in office.


He’s not often challenged, but Mallory Scott, the brother of Reading Mayor Wally Scott, has filed to run against him in the primary April 26.

Caltagirone has been elected to the 127th District, which also includes Kenhorst, every other year since 1971.

On March 1, Caltagirone filed an objection to Mallory Scott’s nominating petition in Commonwealth Court.

Scott needs 300 valid signatures to get on the ballot. He submitted 427 signatures, according to William Andring, Caltagirone’s attorney.

Caltagirone is challenging 238 of them, Andring said.


"It [the nominating petition] is loaded with bad signatures."

These sorts of challenges are typical in many elections, Andring said.

The city is strongly Democratic. Nobody has challenged Caltagirone in a primary or general election since 2004.

In 2004, Caltagirone beat Green Party candidate Stefan Kosikowski 13,300 to 1,300 in the general election.

He beat Republican Francis Acosta 7,000 to 2,400 in the 2002 general election. Acosta later was elected president of City Council. He started a federal jail sentence earlier this month for his part in a bribery scheme.

Caltagirone beat Republican Ann B. Chapin 9,300 to 3,100 in the 2000 general election.

The seat may be unopposed in November general election. The one Republican candidate, Evelyn Morrison, dropped out in February.

Saturday, March 12, 2016

Delegate Christian Leinbach would help make Trump president

by Steve Reinbrecht

Update: Commissioner Leinbach has pledged to support Cruz, not Trump.



+++++++++++++++++++

Conservative Berks County politician Christian Leinbach wants to be a delegate at the Republican convention to help pick the party’s presidential candidate.

For decades, the delegates have had little role. The decision has always been made for them.

This time, of course, is very different. In a contested convention, the delegates' votes would matter. 

Many Republicans don’t like the idea of supporting the likely front-runner, Donald “Get ’em outta here” Trump.

They realize Trump is evilly exploiting the rage, hate and ignorance of millions of Americans to get votes. His cartoonish pronouncements have made him the laughingstock of the world, and they don’t want to be connected to him.

So naturally many even staunch Republicans are defecting, pledging not to support America’s Berlusconi, even against Hillary Clinton.

Leinbach, the chairman of the Berks County commissioners, is asking for votes to be the delegate to the Republican convention, which starts July 18 in Cleveland.

It’s good candidates make clear their views on the elephant in the room.

In his statement, Leinbach suggests that as delegate he would vote for Trump for president.

“If we get to Cleveland and a single candidate has a majority of delegates prior to the convention, than [sic] that candidate should be our nominee. End of story!”

“If a single candidate has a large lead over his rivals, even though he lacks a majority, I still believe we must go with the clear will of the voters and that means supporting the candidate with the decisive lead.”

And that means, as I read it, he’d support Trump.

“I’m not going to support any effort to reverse the will of the voters. To do so would be immoral and severely damage the credibility of the process.”

Leinbach would rather preserve the Party and the process than help prevent a sleazeball like “Get ‘em outta here” Trump become president.



If I were running for delegate, my top message would be: “No way I’m supporting that guy. He gloatingly treats women badly, insults whole groups of people, including Mexicans and Muslims. He encourages violence at his rallies and basks in the support of the hateful and ignorant."

The Reading Eagle pretends it covers politics, even reporting on and editorializing about state issues that are well-covered in other  media.

But the biggest political stories – such as Wally Scott’s brother’s challenging Tom Caltagirone, and who among us supports Trump – get little attention.

Wednesday, March 9, 2016

It’s your circus, and he’s your monkey!

by Steve Reinbrecht

It’s time for local politicians to comment on Donald Trump.

It’s your circus, and he’s your monkey!

Write a letter to the Reading Eagle if you have to, even if no reporter calls, [like DA John Adams did about a DUI hearing held in private, and got it published.]

Will you support Trump if he wins the nomination?

Berks voters deserve to know. Why wait? 

The Eagle ran a story in December in which local politicians "slammed" Trump.

What do local elected officials think now, after votes have been cast?


“Yet, incredibly, the other candidates in the race — Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio and John Kasich — all said they’d support Trump if he wins the nomination.”

“Reince Priebus, Republican National Committee chairman, told CBS’s John Dickerson that his ‘role is to basically be 100 percent behind’ the eventual nominee.”

“At the time of writing a single Republican senator, Ben Sasse of Nebraska, has declared that if Mr Trump is his party’s nominee, he will back an independent conservative. Many more Republicans have said, queasily, that they will back whoever the party nominates. Others are not even that squeamish. On February 26th Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey endorsed Mr Trump,” the Economist reported March 5.

Serious political leaders are publicly saying they will support Donald Trump for president.

What about Berks County?

We elected these people, so we deserve to know what they think about the biggest political issue of the century.

The Reading Eagle ran a story March 3 trying to gauge local sentiment.

But the article in Berks County's top news gathering institution has almost nothing from Berks County legislators.

Most of the content is a rehash of general national comment. I NEED LOCAL NEWS! This is a huge story. What do our local leaders think? Are they too chicken to say?

The reporter quotes one person who represents Berks, U.S. Rep. Ryan Costello, a Republican from Chester County.

"In an email, U.S. Rep. Ryan Costello said it's too early to consider who he'd support for president.”

Here was the chance to say, “WHAT? THIS GUY? FOR PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES?”

Reading Eagle editorial: Trump deserves a chance

by Steve Reinbrecht

The Reading Eagle’s editorial Wednesday about Donald Trump is yet another example of the newsroom leaders’ disconnect with reality. It suggests the evil bullying bigot could be an acceptable president.



The earnest piece demands that Trump provide some details, darn it, to support some of his famous campaign promises.

The editorialist points out that Trump’s tax numbers just don’t add up, although “to be fair, Trump's 15 percent corporate tax rate, with its potential for repatriating corporations and jobs, is worth considering.”

The editorial writer also savages Trump on his plan to build a wall along the Mexican border. Research clearly shows, the Eagle points out, how unaffordable such a wall would be.

And come on, Trump must realize how hard it would be to deport 11 million undocumented workers. The Eagle writer supports this claim with further research. "The American Action Forum estimated its cost at $400 billion to $600 billion over 20 years." 

The answer to the Trump problem, the Eagle argues, is for more details about his ideas. As the Eagle demands, let’s hope Trump explains these things in calm and reasonable detail so that the Eagle newsroom leaders can comprehend how these controversial plans can actually be put in place to make America great again.

The newsroom leaders don't come to the conclusion that Trump is an awful man who must be stopped because he is gleefully tapping into hate and ignorance and unleashing the worst elements of humanity.

Don't the men running the Eagle see Trump as a threat to what America values, as a cynic who has cleverly adopted the election process as Hitler did in the 1930s? Most observers, here and around the world, understand this and are helping to get out the message.

In the meantime, why doesn't the Eagle press some of the many Republicans in Berks County who have been elected to make decisions about our lives on what they think about Trump?

We deserve to know. Berks needs better journalism.

Sunday, March 6, 2016

Front-page non-story shows Reading Eagle leaders’ lack of news judgment

by Steve Reinbrecht

The story on the Reading Eagle’s front page Sunday – the spot traditionally reserved for the best story of the week – is another example of a bunch of words that look like journalism but really are not.

I can see how this happened – some old white male editor in the newsroom really does believe this is an issue, in a hip kind of women’s-lib way, and assigned it.

“Debate over the draft,” the headline says. “Inside the issue.”


But it’s not a “debate” or an “issue.” Who in their right minds would say that though young men have to register for the military draft, young women should not have to?

In fact, nobody in the 1,200-word story says that women should not register, except for a Kutztown University sophomore who says the idea is “scary.”

Because it doesn’t have an idea holding it together, the article disintegrates into a mushy discussion of whether anybody should be drafted, or whether women should fight.

The last time anyone was drafted was 1973.

Berks County needs media with the will and competence to identify and explore REAL issues in the community, and many are inadequately examined.
  • ·      Health-care access for poor people
  • ·      Urban economic development
  • ·      Reading politics
  • ·      Any sort of story about jail operations
  • ·      Recidivism
  • ·      Bail amounts
  • ·      The county nursing home
  • ·      Crime trends
  • ·      The laughable county tourism and visitors bureau
  • ·      Trends in child-pornography arrests
  • ·      Curriculum issues in public schools
  • ·      New businesses springing up around the new hotel in Reading
  • ·      Particle and lead pollution
  • ·      Municipal government transparency
  • ·      How to get treatment if you are addicted to opiates

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

Open letter to Berks lawmakers: Do you support Trump?

By Steve Reinbrecht

I am asking the local state representatives to help me with a story for my blog.

Donald Trump is the front runner for GOP presidential candidate, but even many conservative observers see him as a bigot, a bully, a populist, a demagogue. 


The Economist: “The front-runner is unfit to lead a great political party, let alone America.”

The Federalist: “It’s not just about conservative credentials or his slimy personal history. Donald Trump is a danger to the American ideals of a free and open society.”

George Will: “We are about to learn much about Republican officeholders who are now deciding whether to come to terms with Trump, and with the shattering of their party as a vessel of conservatism.”

The Wall Street Journal: “While some current and former Republican officials have endorsed Donald Trump, others have said they wouldn't support him even if he were the party's presidential nominee.”

Nevertheless, many politicians are starting to hop on the Trump bus.

Here are my questions:
  1. Do you think Trump would be a good president?
  2. Do you support or admire Trump?
  3. Why is he so popular among Republicans?
  4. What does his popularity mean for the future of the Republican Party?
  5. Would you support Donald Trump over Hillary Clinton?
  6. How many of your constituents support him?

I’ll post your answers.
Thanks!

Reading Eagle is wrong that 'leaders' should choose which businesses open

by Steve Reinbrecht

I was surprised at the Reading Eagle’s editorial’s call for Reading leaders to try to pick the businesses that should open downtown. 
These fake people are NOT in Reading.

“As Reading redevelops and brings in new businesses, as we hope will happen, leaders must do all they can to make sure new downtown tenants are a good fit," it said.

I say, let the market do its job. Nobody in Reading is qualified to pick the winners, or arbitrate taste.

Remember when city leaders tried to get an S&M mannequin off Penn Street, objecting to the image it was portraying?

In April 2013, the Eagle ran an editorial about how “a chained nude figure in bondage paraphernalia managed to get a remarkable amount of attention from City Council last week.

“The mannequin had been posed outside the Little Paris store at 523B Penn Street, in the heart of Penn Square, until city leaders took issue with it.

“Members of City Council expressed outrage at the inappropriate display, especially in such a high profile location.

“Councilwoman Marcia Goodman-Hinnershitz pointed out that the store already was pushing the boundaries of good taste by keeping mannequins modeling see-through negligees in its window. Advertising a set of chains and straps on the street simply went too far.”

Following the Eagle’s notion, which leaders would decide what’s a “good fit”?

Economic-development leaders? Al Boscov?

Just set good rules and enforce them.

Maybe sexy mannequins are what Penn Square needs.

I really hope no city leaders are discouraging businesses based on some sort of values.

Reading suffers from poor planning. Maybe it’s time for an organic approach, bottom up from the people who live there.