Sunday, March 6, 2016

Front-page non-story shows Reading Eagle leaders’ lack of news judgment

by Steve Reinbrecht

The story on the Reading Eagle’s front page Sunday – the spot traditionally reserved for the best story of the week – is another example of a bunch of words that look like journalism but really are not.

I can see how this happened – some old white male editor in the newsroom really does believe this is an issue, in a hip kind of women’s-lib way, and assigned it.

“Debate over the draft,” the headline says. “Inside the issue.”


But it’s not a “debate” or an “issue.” Who in their right minds would say that though young men have to register for the military draft, young women should not have to?

In fact, nobody in the 1,200-word story says that women should not register, except for a Kutztown University sophomore who says the idea is “scary.”

Because it doesn’t have an idea holding it together, the article disintegrates into a mushy discussion of whether anybody should be drafted, or whether women should fight.

The last time anyone was drafted was 1973.

Berks County needs media with the will and competence to identify and explore REAL issues in the community, and many are inadequately examined.
  • ·      Health-care access for poor people
  • ·      Urban economic development
  • ·      Reading politics
  • ·      Any sort of story about jail operations
  • ·      Recidivism
  • ·      Bail amounts
  • ·      The county nursing home
  • ·      Crime trends
  • ·      The laughable county tourism and visitors bureau
  • ·      Trends in child-pornography arrests
  • ·      Curriculum issues in public schools
  • ·      New businesses springing up around the new hotel in Reading
  • ·      Particle and lead pollution
  • ·      Municipal government transparency
  • ·      How to get treatment if you are addicted to opiates

No comments:

Post a Comment